Horses
and the Law
Avoiding Liability for Horse Related Incidents
© Kenneth C. Sandoe, Attorney-at-Law
published in The Draft Horse Journal, Spring 2000
Disclaimer -
This article is intended as general discussion and information
on the topic covered, and is not to be construed as rendering
legal advice. If legal advice is needed, you should contact
an attorney. This article may not be reprinted or reproduced
in any manner without prior written permission of the author.
The unthinkable has just happened and you
just got sued! Don’t panic–this article will review
various defenses and strategies available to the horse owner
in these situations.
Prevention is first and foremost in avoiding lawsuits. The
best defense is a liability release or waiver. A liability
release is simply a signed document by the participant stating
that the participant is aware of the dangers of horse-related
activities and, if injured, the participant will not hold the
horse owner responsible for any reason. If a lawsuit is filed,
a legal release is a complete defense, and the lawsuit will
be dismissed.
The key is that the release must be legal! Using fill-in-the-blank
generic forms is not the answer. A release must be fact specific
and tailored to the special needs of the horse owner. This
is because liability releases or waivers are closely scrutinized
by judges. Although properly drafted releases are valid and
binding, defects in the document will cause the release to
be void and of no legal consequence.
The law closely reviews releases because a release transfers
the responsibility of a negligent act from the wrongdoer to
an innocent party. For example, if a horse owner is giving
hay rides and goes on a busy highway for the first time with
a green team and causes an accident, the injured passengers
could not sue the horse owner if the horse owner had the passengers
sign a release before the ride. In essence, the release simply
means “you can ride, but if anything happens, you waive
your right to sue no matter what.”
A valid and binding release must clearly identify the parties
or legal entities to the agreement. Once the parties have been
identified, the release should describe the activities to be
performed and contain a statement that the participant acknowledges
and is aware of the dangers of horse-related activities. Of
critical importance is the waiver language itself. The language
must be clear, concise, conspicuous and unambiguous. I have
made it a practice to use bold type with capital letters so
there is no mistake that the waiver language is emphasized
in the document.
It is a good idea to use a liability release in all situations
involving horse-related activities. It is also important to
consult an attorney before using a release to be certain that
the release you use complies with the law of the state where
you reside. Not all states are the same. Some require very
specific language, where others are more relaxed.
Now a test–go to the premium book of the last show you
entered. Does it contain a liability release? If so, is it
legal? Is that your final answer?
Another defense is found in states which have limited liability
laws for equine activity. (For a description of these laws
and states which have passed these laws, see the author’s
article in the Autumn 1999 issue of the Draft Horse Journal).
Equine limited liability laws protect the horse owner from
lawsuits involving “inherent risks of equine activity.” Generally
this means any unpredictable reaction of a horse. However,
once again check your state law as “inherent risks of
equine activities” is specifically defined in most of
these statues. The caveat about enforcing the defense is that
WARNINGS must be used and placed on and about the premises
of the horse owner. If warnings are not used, the defense established
by the law is waived and cannot be used in court.
The warnings are very specific and must be precisely followed
in order to invoke the protection of the law. The warnings
are different from state to state, so again, check your state
law, however, the following discussion is a general view of
what is consistently seen in the warning requirements.
First, the warnings must be posted and maintained in a clearly
visible location in close proximity to the horse-related activity.
Second, the warning language must appear in large black letters,
with each letter to be a minimum of one inch in height. Third,
the content of the warning must contain language set forth
in the law. For example–
“WARNING: Under (state) Law, an equine activity sponsor,
participant or professional or any other person is not liable
for an injury or loss to or the death of a participant in equine
activities resulting from the inherent risks of equine activities
under the Equine Activity Liability Act.”
If your state has an equine liability law, and if you follow
the posting requirements, you will be able to take advantage
of the defenses established by the law.
A third defense to lawsuits is what the common law refers
to as contributory or comparative negligence and assumption
of the risk. These are technical legal concepts, and contributory
or comparative negligence essentially means that the injured
party is responsible for or causes his or her own injury by
an improper action or inaction. Assumption of the risk is different.
Here, although the fault of the problem is not that of the
injured party, the injured party discovers the problem and
proceeds in the face of known danger and, therefore, legally
assumes the consequences. Assumption of the risk is based on
the legal maxim “volenti non fit injuria”, which
means a person proceeding in the face of known danger cannot
later complain of injury.
The following example will illustrate the difference between
the two concepts.
A participant is harnessing and hitching a team. The participant
confuses the draught line (continuous line) and the coupling
line (long line) so the coupling line is on the outside of
the team and the draught line is crossed between the horses.
Upon leaving the barn, the participant realizes he does not
have proper control because of his mistake in reversing the
lines. This is an example of contributory or comparative negligence.
Now let’s change the example. Participant one is hitching
the team for participant two, and in so doing, confuses the
lines as above. Participant two checks the lines before driving
and discovers that the draught line and the coupling line are
reversed. Participant two decides to drive without correcting
the problem. This is an example of assumption of the risk.
In many cases, the cause of the problem is an action or inaction
of the injured party. In a court of law, if an injured party
substantially contributes to the problem or proceeds in the
face of a known danger, the horse owner will be relieved of
responsibility.
The most troublesome situation continues to be the “innocent
bystander.” Although some equine liability laws cover
innocent bystanders, others do not. In this situation, there
is no liability release, and the focus of any investigation
would be on the horse owner or handler. The best defense in
these cases is common sense and caution. If your team is going
to be in close contact with the public, make sure the horses
and the equipment are fit for the task. Remember, in order
to be held responsible, you must be negligent. If you proceed
in a cautious manner and check your equipment and horses, you
will not be held responsible for unforeseen acts or circumstances.
In conclusion, a legal release or waiver is the strongest
defense to a lawsuit. If you do not have a release, then look
to state law to see if you have defenses available by statute.
Be certain that you have complied with all posting requirements.
Closely view the actions or lack thereof of the parties suing–have
they contributed to the problem or proceeded knowing that something
was wrong? If so, you have a defense to such a lawsuit. Finally,
never forget to use common sense and caution–the foundation
of good horsemanship.
Enough legal talk–it’s time to hitch horses!
Ken is a practicing attorney in Myerstown, Pennsylvania, where
a good bit of his practice involves negligence cases. Ken and
his wife, Karen, own Sunny Hill Farm Belgians, and they have
been exhibiting their six horse hitch for the past few years
at most major shows in the east. |